tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7372876601826078687.post2116007038765918311..comments2024-03-05T05:53:36.239-07:00Comments on The Masculine Heart: Permission to Forgive Ourselves - Releasing Guiltwilliam harrymanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06981478282688361274noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7372876601826078687.post-40900855269057816982011-01-21T18:50:03.589-07:002011-01-21T18:50:03.589-07:00John Stolberg was merely saying that he beleived t...John Stolberg was merely saying that he beleived there wasn't such a thing as 'manliness', and no such thing as a 'real man' and believes people should not be labled as 'masculine' 'feminine'<br /><br />A man is a man, simple, that is what he's saying, it isn't the same of being ashamed of his sex.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7372876601826078687.post-80579040558546096582010-12-23T23:16:47.953-07:002010-12-23T23:16:47.953-07:00You clearly haven't the first clue of history,...You clearly haven't the first clue of history, and are evincing your misandry for everyone to see. <br /><br />Those long-suffering womenfolk from long ago! You would have made the perfect Victorian; men are evil, women are good. Men are perpetrators, women are victims, etc. Which essentially makes you a right-wing reactionary, sexist misandrist, anti-male bigot.<br /><br />If you actually desire to test yourself (bigots such as yourself of course have no use for the truth) why don't you read 'The Legal Subjection of Men' by Ernest Belfort Bax. <br /><br />Female privilege is quite old, but your denial of it is typical of traditionalists who deny male suffering, and see it as their sole duty in life to sacrifice themselves for women's benefit; as I stated earlier this is a typical Victorian mindset. <br /><br />Just how those women suffered from their white feather campaigns and the draft, which obviously forced women to put themselves through psychological torture and risk of death. Clearly to promoters of hate-speech such as yourself that obviously must be true. You probably really do think women were the real victims of men being FORCED to die in foreign countries (for women's benefit). You probably really would espouse the opinion that chivalry benefited men!<br /><br />You might not want to read any older literature from socialist/anti-capitalist authors though. I mean, they actually display working men's lives as innately valuable-like as valuable as a woman's life! Blatant misogyny! <br /><br />Stick to the mawkish and sentimentalism; where we can hear the bemoaning cries of the long-oppressed upper-middle class woman.anti-capitalist/anti-feministnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7372876601826078687.post-77438400334403415732010-12-22T19:59:08.135-07:002010-12-22T19:59:08.135-07:00Interesting, it seems that (from the Christian sta...Interesting, it seems that (from the Christian standpoint) that women are moving the shame of original sin onto Adam. Eve ate of the apple and so all women are temptresses. Men acted violently towards women and so all men are evil. Shame gets passed around and when shame isn't ours it is much more difficult to heal. The healthy version of shame is humility and that is necessary. When we don't recognize our shame we act out. I haven't though of feminism (or gender studies in general) from a shame standpoint, but I think it is quite interesting and useful to do so.<br /><br />meAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com