Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Father-Infant Interactions Reduce Behavior Problems at One Year


Here is another study offering further evidence that fathers are very important in the well-being of children. The two-parent family should never be forced when it is unhealthy, but the evidence keeps piling up that kids do better in a home with two loving, attentive parents/care-givers. The outcome was better for boys than for girls in this study, which may suggest the importance of bonding with a same-sex parent/care-giver.

Child's behavior linked to father-infant interactions, study shows

Posted On: July 18, 2012

Children whose fathers are more positively engaged with them at age three months have fewer behavioural problems at age twelve months, according to new research funded by the Wellcome Trust. The study suggests that interventions aimed at improving parent-child interaction in the early post-natal period may be beneficial to the child's behaviour later on in life.

Behavioural disorders are the commonest psychological problem affecting children. They are associated with a wide range of problems in adolescence and adult life, including academic failure, delinquency, peer rejection and poor psychiatric and physical health. Research suggests that the roots of enduring behavioural problems often extend back into the preschool years.

Epidemiological studies have identified a number of risk factors for the onset and continuity of behavioural problems. Amongst these, parenting characteristics and patterns of parent-child interaction appear to be particularly important. However, studies of parental factors usually focus on the role of the mother.

In a study published today in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, researchers at the University of Oxford studied 192 families recruited from two maternity units in the UK to see whether there was a link between father-child interactions in the early postnatal period and the child's behaviour.

Dr Paul Ramchandani, a researcher and clinical psychiatrist, now based at the Academic Unit of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, led the study, which assessed father-infant interactions in the family home when the child was aged 3 months and compared these against the child's behaviour at age 12 months.

The researchers found that key aspects of the father-infant interaction, measured very early in children's lives, were associated with an increased risk of behavioural problems in children at an early age. This is the first time that this apparent influence has been demonstrated for observed father-infant interaction and such early onset behaviour problems.

"We found that children whose fathers were more engaged in the interactions had better outcomes, with fewer subsequent behavioural problems. At the other end of the scale children tended to have greater behavioural problems when their fathers were more remote and lost in their own thoughts, or when their fathers interacted less with them," explains Dr Ramchandani. "This association tended to be stronger for boys than for girls, suggesting that perhaps boys are more susceptible to the influence of their father from a very early age.

"We don't yet know whether the fathers being more remote and disengaged are actually causing the behavioural problems in the children, but it does raise the possibility that these early interactions are important."

The researchers believe there are a number of possible explanations for the association. The lack of paternal engagement could reflect wider problems in family relationships, with fathers who are in a more troubled relationship with their partner finding it more challenging to engage with their infant. Alternatively, it may reflect a broader lack of supervision and potentially care, for the infant, resulting in an increase in behavioural disturbance. Another possibility is that the infant's behaviour represents its attempt to elicit a parental reaction in response to an earlier lack of parental engagement.

Dr Ramchandani adds: "Focusing on the infant's first few months is important as this is a crucial period for development and the infant is very susceptible to environmental influences, such as the quality of parental care and interaction.

"As every parent knows, raising a child is not an easy task. Our research adds to a growing body of evidence which suggests that intervening early to help parents can make a positive impact on how their infant develops."


3 comments:

Thomas Armstrong said...

Is it politically incorrect to ask if a father-mother parenting pair is the ideal?

I infer from the article that it is not just any two caregivers that bring something to the effort, but caregivers of different attributes that we associate with different genders.

Possibly (likely?), too, a paired (married?) couple is also most ideal if they represent to the infant (later, child) adult love and respect.

I'm not meaning to dis other caregiver arrangements. I am just wondering if the hard science that may be here is walking too quietly in furry slippers on thick carpeting and refuses to give us the bald, bare skinny of what's up.

C'mon, spit it out. Is the nuclear family of Ward and June and Princess and Bud and Kitten what's best!?

William Harryman said...

My opinion, based in part on seeing so many folks who had traditional nuclear families and are seriously traumatized by them, is this:

1. Most important is at least one loving, nurturing parent (or other care-giver) who is consistent and supportive with whom to form an attachment bond.

2. Next is having a supportive, nurturing parent or care-giver with whom to bond and close sibling(s) or extended family support.

3. Ideally every child would have two loving nurturing adults, one of each gender with whom to bond, and some close siblings -- or ideally.1, parents that embodies traits of each gender.

But it always comes back to what Winnicott taught us in the 1950s - a "good enough" parent is most important - no parent is perfect, and no parenting dyad, couple, or village is ever going to be perfect.

As long as there is at least one loving, nurturing, and consistently present adult with whom to form an attachment bond, the kid will have a good chance of being no more messed up than the rest of us.

Thomas Armstrong said...

Excellent response. You've convinced me! Thanks, Bill.