Showing posts with label stay at home dad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stay at home dad. Show all posts

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Report: Rising Number Of Weak, Emasculated Men Working As Stay-At-Home Dads (The Onion)


As is usually the case, The Onion says things many people think but would seldom say out loud, and sadly, this is one of those things.

Report: Rising Number Of Weak, Emasculated Men Working As Stay-At-Home Dads

News With Video
LifestyleISSUE 50•05Feb 6, 2014


WASHINGTON—According to a report released Thursday by the Pew Research Center, a steadily increasing number of weak, emasculated men—if you can still even call them men—are choosing to forego a career and stay at home to raise their children. “Our research shows that thousands of American men—all of whom are pitifully frail and impotent—are leaving the workforce to debase themselves by preparing lunches and tending to their children, ultimately rejecting their role as the family breadwinner in favor of what is effectively gender reassignment,” said head researcher Paul Lopez, noting that the growing ranks of meek, delicate little husbands and fathers often spent their entire days embarrassing themselves and their sex by cleaning, shopping for groceries, and in some extreme cases, folding laundry. “While their anatomy would suggest that, yes, in purely biological terms these are males, their wholesale renunciation of their masculinity has relegated them to the status of subservient, ineffectual nothings who might as well be castrated since that is what they clearly desire anyway.” The report also described a correlated trend of repellent, overly aggressive, testosterone-crazed mothers flooding the corporate world.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Bookforum's Omnivore - A Gender-Related Link Dump

Some gender related links - enjoy. Please be sure to check out the new issue of Men, Masculinities, and Spirituality, which is always a good read.


Friday, December 9, 2011

Recession Dramatically Increases Number Of Fathers Caring For Children

It's sad that it took a recession to do this, but it's good that more men are actively involved in raising their children.

Recession Dramatically Increases Number Of Fathers Caring For Children

(Bloomberg News) Jeff VanderHeijden didn’t expect to be a stay-at-home father for his 3-year-old daughter, especially after getting a raise and promotion as a counselor last year at a residential program for troubled teenagers. Two weeks later, he was fired.

That’s when VanderHeijden, 35, of Carlisle, Pennsylvania, joined the growing ranks of U.S. men spending more time caring for a child. One-third of fathers with working wives are now a regular source of care for their children, the result of the depressed economy and large numbers of out-of-work men, the U.S. Census Bureau reported yesterday.

“Certain projects like refinishing the basement kind of had to go on hold, but it really pays off in the long run,” said VanderHeijden, whose wife works as a teacher. “You can’t put a price on a father-daughter relationship.”

The number of dads regularly caring for children under age 15 increased to 32 percent in 2010 from 26 percent in 2002. Among those fathers with preschool-age children, one in five served as the primary caregiver, meaning adults such as VanderHeijden who spend the most time with their child, the census found.

The recession has increased the number of fathers with an active role in child care, a trend that has been growing since at least 1988, said Lynda Laughlin, a family demographer at the Census Bureau.

“The economy hasn’t completely rebounded, particularly for men,” she said. “What did they label it, a ‘mancession?’”

The economic downturn initially had a greater effect on men than women, with males losing more net jobs between December 2007 and May 2011, according to a July report from the Pew Research Center. Men have regained jobs more quickly in the recovery, the Pew study found.

During recessions, fathers spend more time as partial and primary caregivers of children, Laughlin said, partly because unemployment or changes in work hours increase their availability to do so. “It also can reduce available income to pay for child care outside of the home,” she said.

The recession isn’t the only reason. Women are increasingly contributing more to family income than men, and there is a growing desire among men to take part in the lives of their children, according to Ellen Galinsky, president and co-founder of the New York-based Families and Work Institute.

“The good news is that kids are with their fathers more,” Galinsky said. “The bad news is that families are so squeezed economically.”

The new statistics, from the Census Survey of Income and Program Participation, showed that 54 percent of unemployed fathers with a working wife and preschool-age children are primary caregivers, while 17 percent of employed fathers in the same situation fill that role.

Some couples decide that the cost of child care cancels out the income from a lower-wage job, regardless of the recession.

“If I’m making X and my wife is making X plus 10, who do you want making the money?” said Patrick Spillman, 42, of New York, who’s the primary caregiver for his 3-year-old daughter. “It’s a matter of dollars and cents.”

About three years ago, Lance Somerfeld, 38, found there were few resources for fathers like him after he decided to stay at home with his newborn son. He started the NYC Dads Group and watched it grow into 500 men who share ideas for museum trips, classes, play groups and other activities.

Most of the men in the group weren’t laid off. Instead, he said, they have wives who are making more money or are further along in their careers.

“I just see dads wanting to be a part of their kids’ lives,” Somerfeld said.

Friday, February 11, 2011

The Good Men Project - Are Stay-at-Home Dads Macho?

Silly that anyone even has to ask that question - macho is a cliche of hypermasculinity that has nothing to do with reality. That's the important point from my perspective.

THEN, any man who does is job as a father is as manly as it gets. Just be a dad - go to music recitals, ball games, school plays, or volunteer as a coach, Den mother, or whatever. All you need to do is be a loving, compassionate person in their lives who helps them navigate the struggles of growing up.

Here are a couple of excerpts from the article (edited - I don't think the machismo talk is useful - so I cut it), but you should go read the whole piece. I wish it had been longer and included some perspectives from other fathers who stay home with their kids - there is a whole mess of daddy blogs out there by stay-at-home dads.

Are Stay-at-Home Dads Macho?

In the fourth of a five-part series on love and relationships, Tom Matlack and author Laura Munson debate the question: Are stay-at-home dads macho?

MATLACK: I spent 18 months at home with my young children just after getting divorced. I only had the kids part-time and I found it amazingly hard when they weren’t around—and amazingly rewarding when they were.

The feeling of holding a child, especially my own, in the crook of my neck is as close to God as I have ever been. When my life was completely falling apart around me—at least in part because I’d been working so hard that I had completely forgotten that I was a father—spending time with my kids reminded me what was important and gave me a purpose.

* * * * *

Mothers have something essential to give their children, but what dads have to offer is no less important.

For those of us who have finally, fully internalized that fact, there is nothing in our lives more important than our children—and no one is going to tell us otherwise. We will dive through brick walls—and endure being called “sissies”—to care for our kids in a way that makes up for time lost in prior generations.

* * * * *

For men in 2011, the primary challenge is to figure out how to be at home with our kids while still holding down a job. To those guys who stay home to raise their kids: You are lucky, macho men. The dad at the playground or the “Mommy and Me” playgroup doesn’t have to cower over in the corner. He can stand tall and do his thing, playing with his kid in a manly way, because it is cool to be a dad.


Thursday, January 27, 2011

Daddy Dialectic - Parenting While Male: 74 Fathers Talk about Playground Discrimination


Interesting - it seems that stay-at-home dads still are not accepted as actual, honest-to-god parents. "Parenting while male" is how some dads refer to the discrimination they face. Sad, very sad.

Parenting While Male: 74 Fathers Talk about Playground Discrimination

Posted by Jeremy Adam Smith

You’ve probably heard the phrase “driving while black,” which refers to a perception that black drivers are more likely to be stopped by cops. This was whispered in the African-American community for years before it broke out into the wider cultural conversation and was gradually validated by empirical studies.

Similarly, stay-at-home dads have whispered for years about feeling unfairly targeted for "parenting while male," and recently their concerns have started to get mainstream attention. In last week's Wall Street Journal, Free-Range Kids author Lenore Skenazy explored what happens when “when almost any man who has anything to do with a child can find himself suspected of being a creep.”

I spotted the column in a tweet from the redoubtable DadLabs. I replied: “I was once asked to leave a playground by a grandmother. I wonder how many guys have had that experience?” DadLabs tweeted back: “Most? Or faced playdate discrimination of one kind or another? #dadsnotpervs.”

This little twitter exchange echoes less-public discussion I’ve heard many times at gatherings of fathers: that they are often made to feel like outsiders at parks, playgrounds, and situations where most of the other parents are moms or grandmoms—and that their participation in playgroups or classes is sometimes rejected.

Atrocity stories circulate, but how widespread are actual "parenting while male" experiences, really? To start to get the answer, on Monday I created this survey, which as of this morning had been taken by 74 guys—60 percent of whom spend 31 or more hours a week taking care of a child.


Friday, November 5, 2010

On Being a Stay at Home Dad

This is getting to be more and more common - men who do so are choosing to be stay at home dads - either because their wife makes enough money to make that possible, or because they have occupations that allow them to work from home or at home. I am impressed by this shift in parenting duties - and I applaud men who can make this commitment to their children and their development.

First up, a podcast from Dads Unplugged:

Why SAHD is a disservice to all Dads

Why SAHD is a disservice to all Dads

Every group wants an acronym. It kind of proves you have made it. However, this acronym is not helping any men, anywhere. SAHD stands for Stay at Home Dads, but why should someone be SAHD if they are staying home with the kids? Kent and Todd try to come up with a new acronym, but with the help of Jeff Pugh from Man of the House.com they decide on using an old staple and it fits just perfectly.

And here is the perfect tie-in to that podcast, a cool article from Man of the House on how being a stay at home dad is good for your brain (as well as your children's brains). I've posted on the neuroscience element of this before, in terms of neurogenesis in the father's brain when he bonds with his newborn, but this is a different perspective.

Being a Stay-At-Home Dad Is Good For the Brain

A friend of mine was recently telling me about his new baby and his wife, and was saying that now the baby was almost two months old his wife was going back to work. He said that (among other reasons) she missed the "intellectual stimulation" of work, and that I of course could probably relate.

I’m a stay-at-home dad, and while I agreed initially out of courtesy, after thinking about it for a while I have to admit that I don't really agree. I've been a stay-at-home Dad for six years now, and though I do miss the social stimulation of working with adults, intellectual stimulation isn't a problem.

Maybe it was different for my Mom and Dad when I was a child (before the Internet - gasp!), but I'm intellectually stimulated way more now than when I was working. I liked my job in my pre-dad life and I was challenged often, but a decent portion of my work back then involved things I could do on auto-pilot. But now when the kids are at school I have a few hours a day to pursue things that I never would have been able to before. Instead about worrying if a project was going to come in on time and under budget, my dad-life gave me the time to really study wine (one of my passions) and become a certified Sommelier. Instead of spending the day in spreadsheets I can spend the day practicing and learning about photography. And instead of being preoccupied with office politics I now am preoccupied with making sure my kids are working hard on their homework.

Social stimulation is harder when you're a stay-at-home parent. Some people join Mom or Dad's groups, make friends at parks and play dates, and some people (like myself) start a blog. Whatever it might be, getting some adult conversation going is pretty important, and I found it was something I took for granted in my working-life.

To be fair, the first two months of being a parent aren't very intellectually stimulating regardless, mostly because you are constantly working on keeping your new little human being alive and happy. And while we all know this is the most important thing in the world, by the end of those two months digging ditches might seem more intellectually stimulating. And I still really do miss the day-to-day interactions with other adults that I used to get when I worked in an office.

But as long as you create goals and allow yourself to pursue your passions in those moments you aren't changing diapers or giving a bottle, you can find just as much to feed your brain as you did at your previous job - if not more.

I know the economy has left a lot of men who were used to the office life at home and frustrated. But being home with the kids is just as, if not more, important. And unlike the 9 to 5 slug, it gives you an opportunity to prioritize and turn your passions into opportunities.


Saturday, September 18, 2010

Brian Gresko - Nurture vs. Nature: Which Determines Our Personality More?

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj8L1pd1U9cYpGoWbvtXruBg5Qe1Q_w1lOoMpS0EiFUF-f2vlxoHEn45T42VAV635Rjxx4tw2Cnm0Gyqk0GC8IFKA55Zg90Lr6rMNDllOXMCsFqucyL9BTdSQ_l2KWQyKOgHYkq6mGP3ZE/s1600/j0423038.jpg

This is not an academic argument about the nature/nurture issue - it's a stay-at-home dad's eyes view of the question as he watches his son grow up. I like that. In fact, I admire any parents who take a conscious role in their children's lives - I had inadequate parents and I am not cut out to be a parent, so I am in awe of those who do it with heart and soul, and with awareness.
Nurture vs. Nature: Which Determines Our Personality More?

Brian Gresko

Posted: September 2, 2010

My 15-month-old son Mr. F has taken to touching kids' hair as a way of saying hello. Often these soft caresses morph into rough grabs, and then there I am, pulling my well-intentioned and slightly confused son off, apologizing like mad to the other kid's parent. Some say, "Don't apologize--it's not your fault."

But it's hard not to feel like he's a reflection of me, and so I make excuses for his irrational baby behavior--the clinginess ("usually he loves exploring, but...") and temper tantrums ("teething has him all agro")--as if I'm the one responsible for it.

See, for years I taught middle school, and from my perch in the classroom I thought that nurture trumped nature, that with the right guidance and support any child's personality could be shaped and molded. I would hear things like, "But Mr. Gresko, she's never enjoyed reading," and I'd tell those disgruntled parents if life gives you lemons, make lemonade--heap on the encouragement and try harder! Sure, the child him or herself was the most important factor in the transformation, but the teacher and parents were not powerless.

Now, as a parent, I'm not so sure how much agency I actually have. Mr. F's come out with a personality that's all his own, of which I've had no active part in creating.

I am actually a good case study in this regard, having been brought up by a man who is not my biological father. Upon meeting the man I call Dad, friends notice how alike we are--our sparkly eyes, our social liveliness, our funny stories. My dad and I share mannerisms and idioms. People often ask if I'm Italian, and culturally he raised me as such, though genetically there's nada. This makes sense, given the role my dad played in nurturing me as I grew.

Once my son was born, I wondered about nature, that big question mark of my genetic makeup. So I tracked down my biological father, and we sat down together for the first time a couple of weeks ago.

The night before, my jittery Bio-dad called to check in with me. "You shining your shoes?" he asked. "Getting ready for the big event?"

Shining my shoes, no. But I had picked out a fun shirt to wear, a linen button-up with a vibrant, yellow pattern. I wore it with the top three buttons undone, "Miami Vice" style. Bio-dad also turned up wearing a yellow button-up, similarly open at the collar. Besides both loving to showcase our thick mat of chest hair, we share the same laugh, as well as a penchant for cracking dirty jokes at inappropriate times, especially when nervous. He let off a constant run of zingers when we first sat down together.

As we shared details about our lives, he said, "You're independent, like me," and it's true, I am.

Though maybe not quite as wild. I've only kidded about being a teenage father, while this guy was one. Still, I recognized parts of him in me.

Exactly how much of my personality comes from genetics and how much from environment is something I'll never know, but obviously some comes from each direction and they've blended into something unique. Bio-dad's overindulgence in food, drink and life in general have perhaps (hopefully) been tempered by my dad's healthier habits and more disciplined willpower. Though perhaps I have Bio-dad's adventurous streak to blame for my frequent career changes and reevaluations, something my more stable Dad doesn't always understand.

The question then becomes, what amount of power do I have to affect change in my son's personality?

Now, when he's not yet verbal and often operates from a primal, emotional state, it doesn't feel like I can do much except be patient. And stop apologizing for him. Because while I may not accept his behavior, what's coming out in this early stage is not a reflection of me in any way I can control. Mr. F represents me on a genetic level, not the conscious me I chose him to be.

Once again I find that parenting is about ceding control. Control over whether or not I can always keep this little guy safe, or affect behavior that might just be hardwired. Some of that crazy aunt or neurotic in-law might have made their way into Mr. F. All I can do is love him for his quirks, and hope that, with enough love and positive encouragement, everything will turn out alright.